You’re invited once direction is already set
You’re evaluated on certainty, polish, or price
Your thinking is treated as input, not judgement
Procurement appears after trust has already been allocated
By the time selling begins, relevance has already been decided.
Whether your work enters before or after decisions form
Which kinds of proximity you do and don't have
Why your effort is high while influence remains low
Turn AI into execution capability.
Build credibility. Deliver results.

Static Credibility
Most potential clients don’t know you exist unless someone introduces you.

Visible Expertise
Some people recognise your name, but you’re rarely the obvious choice.

Emerging Recognition
Your thinking is shared internally, but you have little or no influence.

Proximity in Practice
You are sometimes involved early, but only when you act with discipline.

Systemised Proximity
You are consistently involved before decisions are made, without pitching.
Proximity Management (PxM) is the discipline of becoming trusted before decisions are made.
It exists because, in most consulting situations, by the time a consultant is invited to pitch, the real decision context already exists — and they are not part of it.
PxM focuses on how judgement and trust enter organisations upstream of procurement, scope, and selection processes. It aligns with how decisions actually form, not how they are later formalised.
PxM isn't marketing or selling.


Consultants do not lose work because they lack expertise.
They lose because trust forms earlier than they arrive.
Most effort is spent improving:
• visibility
• positioning
• credentials
• pitch quality
None of these affect the moment that matters most:
the moment when people decide whose judgement they trust to help them think.
PxM is not about persuading buyers. It's about shaping understanding before problems are locked in.
There are many legitimate ways proximity can form inside organisations.
This system teaches one disciplined approach.
That approach works by:
• engaging with work organisations already care about
• clarifying what that work signals, assumes, or changes
• allowing that interpretation to circulate internally without pressure
• letting trust form through usefulness, not persuasion


PxM is working when:
• your thinking is referenced before you are present
• you are involved before scope or procurement exists
• conversations begin with framing, not selling
The outcome is not more leads.
PxM is for Consultants Who:
• Are capable and credible, yet consistently arrive too late
• Are tired of pitching into decisions that are already settled
• Value judgement more than visibility
• Can tolerate silence and delayed return
• Want to be involved before scope, procurement, or pitching
PxM is Not Those Who:
• Need quick wins or predictable deal flow
• Rely on pitching to survive
• Equate activity or visibility with progress
• Want tactics, scripts, or templates
• Don't think long-term
PxM filters rather than persuades.

Consultants arrive after decisions have begun to form.
Selling happens at the boundary.
Trust is requested under pressure.
Judgement is already familiar.
Meaning has already circulated.
Trust exists before decisions are made.
PxM does not improve selling.
It changes when trust is formed.
Decisions rarely begin with requirements. They begin with uncertainty, quiet testing, and internal sense-making.
By the time a formal process appears, people have already decided whose judgement they trust to help them.
Pitches don't shape that moment. They confirm it.
This is why capable consultants feel interchangeable, and why selling feels harder each year.
The problem isn't visibility. It's timing.
This system teaches Proximity Management (PxM).
PxM is practised in many legitimate ways, but we focus on one disciplined way of practising it.
Here, Proximity Management is practised through interpretive work.
Rather than selling expertise or proposing solutions, the consultant contributes judgement by clarifying the meaning of work an organisation has already created.
That work may be a strategy, announcement, initiative, framework, or commitment that already carries internal significance — but whose implications have not yet been clearly named.
The consultant produces a single, finished interpretation:
clarifying direction, constraint, or trade-off that already exists.
It is allowed to circulate without explanation, defence, or pursuit.
Nothing is pitched.
Nothing is requested.
Trust forms through exposure to judgement, not persuasion.
The examples below are not tactics to copy.
They illustrate a recurring pattern: how trust forms when judgement arrives before decisions.
In this system, PxM is practised through interpretive work.
Each example follows the same discipline:
Real organisational work → One finished interpretation → Quiet internal circulation → Early access
No selling.
No follow-up.
1. Data & AI Consultant (Enterprise Context)
A data consultant is repeatedly asked to price pilots after strategy is fixed.
They interpret an internal data-platform announcement, clarifying what it assumes about governance, ownership, and decision rights.
The interpretation circulates among programme leads struggling with feasibility.
2. Agentic AI Consultant
An AI specialist encounters high interest but shallow engagement.
They interpret an AI roadmap, clarifying where accountability has shifted from humans to systems — and where new failure modes quietly emerge.
A transformation lead shares the work internally as leadership confidence begins to wobble.
3. Enterprise Transformation Consultant
A consultant known for delivery is rarely involved upstream.
They interpret a newly published operating-model framework, naming the tension between central control and local autonomy.
Senior managers use the interpretation to articulate concerns without appearing resistant.
4. Platform / Ecosystem Specialist
A platform specialist is confined to implementation roles.
They interpret a partner-ecosystem move, reframing the discussion from features to organisational readiness.
The work circulates among strategy and product teams debating future direction.